See AR, Tab 9, SSDM, at 1-13. She also discussed risks and weaknesses in ES’s proposal that she considered to be important. D, SLAs, at 1-92. Marine-Asia PTE, Ltd., B-402687.6, B-402687.7, Oct. 13, 2011, 2012 CPD ¶ 3 at 5. For instance, the contractor’s monthly payment would be reduced by as much as 30 percent if the contractor was assessed 550 or more service credits in a month. Id. AR, Tab 9, SSDM, at 4; see id., app. Copper River Enterprise Services, LLC, strengthens federal cyber defense IT infrastructures. Elite Enterprise Services, LLC has 5 total employees across all of its locations and generates $2.00 million in sales (USD). Multi Location Business Find locations. The SSEB found that ES responded to all eight criteria for the topic. ; see also PEC at 4 (relative importance of the factors). The protester represents that ES has the same Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, System for Award Management (SAM) registration, internal corporate structure, place of business, and employees as HPES had. TONS OF SOD WEEKLY. See NSA Req. NSA Req. Id. Business company ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC is a legal entity registered under the law of State Nevada. Id. Feb 9, 2018. See Protest at 39; Comments/Supp. ES similarly points out that an acceptable rating was reserved for a “no worse than moderate” risk of unsuccessful performance, see PEC at 2, and argues that the rating was incorrect because the SSEB highlighted aspects of its model that actually reduced risk. at 12; PEC at 10. Comments at 3. 4000 N MINGO RD TULSA, OK 74116 Get Directions (918) 292-6400. Business Info. She also expressly acknowledged that AT&T’s proposal came at a “significant price premium.”  Id. The protester objects to numerous aspects of NSA’s evaluation of ES’s proposal under the non-price factors. Here, the SSA, who serves as the deputy head of the contracting activity, concluded that AT&T’s superior technical solution warranted paying a price premium of $757 million over 10 years. 16, 2015, 2015 CPD ¶ 108 at 7; Walton Constr.--a CORE Co., LLC, B‑407621, B‑407621.2, Jan. 10, 2013, 2013 CPD ¶ 29 at 6 (no requirement to monetize features of competing proposals); Structural Pres. AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 43‑49. for Dismissal at 5‑6, citing FCi Fed., Inc., B-408558.7, B-408558.8, Aug. 5, 2015, 2015 CPD ¶ 245 and Wyle Labs., Inc., B-408112.2, Dec. 27, 2013, 2013 CPD ¶ 16. Under these circumstances, the fact that the actual offeror now operates under a different name and is organized under a different parent company does not strip that entity of its rights to protest this procurement. Alice S. Chong, Esq., and William R. Buonaccorsi, Esq., National Security Agency, for the agency. She highlighted the “wide gap in expected performance” between the firms, and listed specific advantages in AT&T’s proposal. FCi Fed., Inc., supra, at 7. Then, in an introductory paragraph, she succinctly summarized the evaluation findings, as follows: Across the Technical factor, the Government found that AT&T will provide a greater ability to field enterprise equipment, a more consistent and reliable baseline, a stronger plan for support, a multi-pronged approach to monitoring mission and a more reliable and secure infrastructure that will lead to a much higher likelihood of reliability and availability. AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 18-26. See id.at 5-10. [3] The SSA concluded that there was “no discernable difference between the offerors” under the past performance factor. Further, we decline to entertain the agency’s assertion that the protest should be dismissed because, in NSA’s view, ES cannot perform the contract as proposed due to the corporate transaction. #200 Mississauga, ON L4V 1W1. Id. Veterans Enterprise Services, LLC (VES) is a highly notable growing company which will help you explore multiple commodities and products available locally and nationally. The SSA also plainly accepted that AT&T’s superiority came at a price. Headquarters. AR, Tab 9, SSDM, at 1-17 (including appendices). See id. According to ES, because its proposal’s sole strength under this ETA outweighed the lack of weaknesses, it merited a higher rating. Gov’t, Inc., B-412340 et al., Jan. 20, 2016, 2016 CPD ¶ 43 at 8 (denying protest allegation that awardee Hewlett Packard Enterprise Services would not be able to perform as proposed as a result of its parent company splitting into two companies). II, app. Moreover, and significantly, the solicitation did not advise offerors that the service credits would be used in a pre-award context to quantify any of the evaluation findings. Solutions, Inc., B-409720, B-409720.2, July 21, 2014, 2014 CPD ¶ 230 at 8. The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. ES also asserts that the agency’s decision to award the contract to AT&T’s higher-rated, higher-priced proposal was unreasonable. By choosing Enterprise Services LLC you'll be putting operational excellence and best-in-class technology to work for you. The scenario in that procurement is inapposite to the facts here. In making her best-value determination, the SSA described the “critical importance” of the agency’s IT system, and the “vital nature” of enterprise IT to mission success. Of relevance here, ES had, in fact, previously explained how it would mitigate risk in the event GES did not provide the [DELETED], but this explanation was deleted in the final version of its proposal. Prosperity Enterprise Services LLC A freight broker you can depend on! Around the world, the COVID-19 pandemic is challenging families, businesses and communities. 2. In making her best-value determination, she concluded: I recognize that $757,323,370 over a 10-year period is a significant price premium. A full-service electrical firm headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. Get the expertise you need to solve your biggest IT challenges. The SSEB identified one strength--ES’s approach to refreshing certain non‑compliant assets [DELETED]--and five areas where ES simply met the requirements. Servs. The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 1998031331. [6]  Id. Resources Enterprise Services Llc principal address is C/O Ct Corporation System 111 Eighth Avenue New York, New York, 10011. of DXC Technology Co. American Enterprise Group makes strides in diversity and inclusion initiatives. As noted above, the SSEB found that ES’s approach under the service delivery model topic area would have “little impact on contract performance,” thus falling squarely within the definition of an acceptable rating. Id. As the world shifted and pivoted in 2020, so did American Enterprise Group’s human resources team. AR, Tab 7, SSEB Report for AT&T, at 1. Find an airport or neighborhood car rental location near you and hit the road! Where, as here, an RFP indicates that technical considerations are more important than price considerations in determining the best value to the government, selecting a technically superior, higher-priced proposal is proper where the agency reasonably concludes that the price premium is justified in light of the proposal’s technical superiority. ES’s argument is unpersuasive and misplaced. The solicitation advised that, in the event the contractor failed to meet performance level metrics that were set forth in the SLAs, the contractor would be assessed financial credits, the amount of which varied depending on the SLA. [7]  NSA’s reliance on this line of decisions is misplaced. These cases--where we explore whether an awardee can perform as contemplated in its proposal--are inapposite to the issue here, which is strictly whether a firm qualifies as an interested party to file a protest. Comments/Supp. Enterprise Services provides mission-enabling, shared-service solutions for the Department of Commerce. Next, the SSA performed a cost/technical tradeoff. ; see also id. In assigning the weakness, the SSEB explained that ES’s assumption that the Global Enterprise Services (GES) provider would “use [DELETED], or be able to provide an [DELETED] increased the risk that [ES would] not be able to deliver the failover and data replication strategy proposed.”  AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 18. Protest at 28. In addition, the protest record includes a letter from the chief executive officer of Hewlett Packard confirming that ES would continue to have access to the “full range of products and services” that it had under Hewlett Packard in connection with its RIS I proposal. 703-245-9675. In our view, the agency’s arguments in this regard reflect a reevaluation of HPES’s proposal during the protest proceeding, which is generally not something our Office will consider. Protest at 7-20. [8] Equally distinguishable are decisions where a protester is denied interested party status because it is deemed ineligible--as opposed to unable or incapable--to perform the contract. Id. [16]  In defending the weakness, the agency explains that ES’s approach “implicitly assumed that the GES provider would either use [DELETED], or be able to provide an [DELETED].”  MOL at 33. WE BUILD YOUR DREAM PROJECT. Enterprise Logistic Services LLC Overview. J.20, Proposal Evaluation Criteria (PEC), at 1. Looking for more? Corp., B-275356, Feb. 11, 1997, 97-1 CPD ¶ 91; see also L-3 Army Sustainment LLC, B-415349.2, B‑415349.3, Jan. 3, 2018, 2018 CPD ¶ 13 at 7-8 (finding unobjectionable an agency’s use of a quantification tool to compare potential benefits of offerors’ competing technical approaches). MOL at 16; Applied Tech. See id. For price, the solicitation advised that the agency would evaluate proposed prices for reasonableness, realism, and balance, and compute an evaluated price for each offer. Id. The agency explains further that since the GES contract did not have a requirement to perform in the manner ES implicitly assumed, there was a risk that GES’s managed hosting and data replications would differ from ES’s proposed approach. First, ES points to eight ETAs and/or subfactors where it argues the agency misevaluated its proposal. 1. Contact. What We Do. A last example relates to the agency’s evaluation under the transition and future state factor’s technology refresh evaluation topic area. Dev. Protester’s Response to NSA Req. Regardless, ES’s focus on the adjectival rating itself is misdirected. 0. at 18-20. PEC at 9 (ETA A.1.2). Enterprise services architecture generally includes high-level components and principles of object-oriented design employed to match the current heterogeneous world of IT architecture. 0. for Dismissal at 2; id., exh. Guiding Principles: TRUST, TEAMWORK, MUTUAL RESPECT – This is the DNA of GES. Id. See AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 1‑137; Tab 7, SSEB Report for AT&T, at 1-141. Feb 9, 2018. A protester’s disagreement with an agency’s judgment in evaluating proposals is insufficient to establish that the agency acted unreasonably. The protester asserts that the record is devoid of explanation as to why AT&T’s proposal was worth a $757 million price premium, particularly in light of the fact that both firms met the solicitation requirements. Supported technologies include cloud, on-premise, front-end, middleware, all database, legacy, ERP, and DXP. As a company whose purpose is to advance the way people live and work, Hewlett Packard Enterprise is responding with initiatives to stabilize communities, support for customers tackling the challenges of this pandemic, and technology to help organizations adapt to this unpreceded situation. Innovative Management & Technology Approaches, Inc. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General: Fraud and Abuse; Removal of Safe Harbor Protection for Rebates Involving Prescription Pharmaceuticals and Creation of New Safe Harbor Protection for Certain Point-of-Sale Reductions in Price on Prescription Pharmaceuticals and Certain Pharmacy Benefit Manager Service Fees, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General: Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; Revisions to Safe Harbors Under the Anti-Kickback Statute, and Civil Monetary Penalty Rules Regarding Beneficiary Inducements, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Organ Procurement Organizations Conditions for Coverage: Revisions to the Outcome Measure Requirements for Organ Procurement Organizations. See Protest at 23-39. The solicitation expressed the relative importance of the factors as follows:  the technical factor was equal in importance to the management factor, and both the technical and management factors were more important than the transition and future state factor, which was more important than the past performance factor. Nevertheless, the SSA ultimately concluded that the “significant benefits of AT&T’s proposal . DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE For more on Enterprise Services, please enjoy this overview video 5400 Legacy Dr, Plano, TX 75024 In the news. Rent with confidence with Enterprise's Complete Clean Pledge. Sys., Inc., supra. Next, we turn to the merits of ES’s protest allegations. As the agency explains, the weakness primarily was based on the lack of detail regarding ES’s proposed approach. Id. Id. at 2. In its report, the agency substantively refutes all of the protester’s allegations. PWS at 4; see id. The contract has a maximum value of $3.325 billion and covers a 10‑year period of performance, which includes a 5-year base period and two option periods. at 1. In this respect, ES complains that the acceptable rating was improper because the RFP’s adjectival/risk rating definitions provided for an acceptable rating when strengths and weaknesses were offsetting. We Focus On Safety at All of Our Trimming Jobs And Make Sure Our Work Meets All Your Requirements. Under this ETA, the agency would assess the degree to which the offeror’s proposed service delivery model would be able to deliver the services to meet the requirements of the contract. . She emphasized AT&T’s “low level of risk” to support service delivery and technical refresh. [1]  See id. VT Griffin Servs., Inc., B‑299869.2, Nov. 10, 2008, 2008 CPD ¶ 219 at 4. Id. at 10-12. We will implement an [DELETED] of all HPE-provided tool suites. Be a flexible company that can quickly adjust and respond to customer needs. NASA.gov brings you the latest images, videos and news from America's space agency. Protester’s Response to NSA Req. [5]  Decl. A, attach. 525 Route 73 N Ste 104. In a best-value tradeoff procurement, it is the function of the selection official to perform a price/technical tradeoff, that is, to determine whether one proposal’s technical superiority is worth the higher price, and the extent to which one is sacrificed for the other is governed only by the test of rationality and consistency with the stated evaluation criteria. As discussed above, the SSA reviewed the SSEB’s consolidated reports and the SSAC’s recommendation, and she documented her award determination in a comprehensive source selection decision memorandum. Next, the SSA performed a comparative assessment of proposals. Id. The evaluators assigned ES’s proposal an acceptable rating after documenting three strengths, two minor weaknesses, and nine areas where ES simply met the requirements. Staff Augmentation . Indeed, as discussed above, the contemporaneous record shows that the offeror proposed an acceptable approach to perform the RIS I services. For instance, according to the protester, an acceptable rating correlated to a 20 percent deduction in the monthly invoice (401-425 service credits). at 12. at 5-6. E.g., Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.; Leidos Inc., B-410032.4 et al., Mar. [11]  See AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 4-94. The company id for this entity is 20090343. Integral Sys., Inc., B-405303, Aug. 16, 2011, 2011 CPD ¶ 161 at 3. However, the protester’s frustration with the source selection decision does not provide a basis to sustain the protest. Id. app. for Dismissal at 3-9. Enterprise Services LLC (ES), of Herndon, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to AT&T Corporation, of Columbia, Maryland, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. Enterprise Services LLC is an Indiana Domestic Limited-Liability Company filed on March 18, 1998. PWS at 1. A protester’s disagreement with the agency’s determinations as to the relative merits of competing proposals, or disagreement with its judgment as to which proposal offers the best value to the agency, does not establish that the source selection decision was unreasonable. ROAD Forward is a $55 million commitment to organizations that advance social and racial equity in communities around the world. at 32. Get the latest updates on NASA missions, watch NASA TV live, and learn about our quest to reveal the unknown and benefit all humankind. A Veteran Owned Small Business. Also, we agree with the agency that having strengths that numerically outnumber weaknesses did not, by itself, necessitate that the rating be higher than acceptable. ; Contracting Officer’s Statement (COS) at 2. This legal entity was firstly registered on 22nd March 2005 under the legal form of Domestic Limited-Liability Company. GAO's Office of General Counsel issues legal decisions, opinions, and reports on bid protests, appropriations law, and other issues of federal law. See, e.g., Glenn Def. at 6-8. The protester’s argument, while creative, misses the mark. Servs., Inc.; Raytheon Tech. [10]  The protester asserts that NSA ignored aspects of its proposed solutions, improperly assigned weaknesses and risks, and/or misapplied the rating scheme outlined in the RFP. Dell Servs. Protest at 20. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.”  PEC at 2. The RFP advised, though, that price was still a substantial factor. See Computer World Servs. Enterprise Services Group, LLC. Here, we have no basis to conclude that the protester lacks status as an interested party as a result of the corporate transaction. Enterprise Services LLC (ES), of Herndon, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to AT&T Corporation, of Columbia, Maryland, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. Comments at 21-24. In addition, ES was not required to use GES for managed hosting and data replication, but in doing so, the firm presented NSA with “incomplete detail on how those services would be handled if [ES’s] critical infrastructure fails.”[17]  Id. [20]  See Comments/Supp. The firm also provides consulting and support to corporations and government clients. PEC at 30 (ETA C.1.2.). You can find this business by geo coordinates: 40° 44' 27.4" N , 74° 0' 7.6" W. Fed. . She compared and contrasted the “noteworthy and significant differences between the two proposals” across the three most important non-price factors. D&B Hoovers provides sales leads and sales intelligence data on over 120 million companies like Elite Enterprise Services, LLC around the world, including contacts, … Enterprise Services LLC (ES), of Herndon, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to AT&T Corporation, of Columbia, Maryland, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. [7] In FCi Federal, our Office sustained a protest where the agency, in undertaking corrective action and after the awardee had been sold to another company, failed to consider that the awardee’s proposal no longer reflected the manner in which the contract would be performed and the resources, experience, and past performance to be relied upon in the performance of the contract. Indeed, as described above, the application of the RFP’s service credits was strictly a post-award, negative performance incentive designed to facilitate contractor accountability in the event required performance metrics were not achieved. Comments/Supp. AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 77-79. AR, Tab 8, CAR, at 4-30. Timeshare Companies. By leveraging Enterprise Services' shared service model, individual bureaus can focus on their unique missions. 100 NORTHCREEK STE 800 ATLANTA, GA 30327 Get Directions (404) 812-2533. Business Info. [6] For its part, the protester maintains that the agency is incorrect. Wyle Labs., Inc., B-311123, Apr. The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 1998031331. In this respect, NSA urges our Office to dismiss the protest because, according to NSA, ES is a different entity than the company that submitted the proposal. Phone: 905-405-6223 In sum, ES’s varied objections firmly establish that the protester believes its less expensive proposal was a better value for the agency. Company is located in the register with the Company number E0135072005-8 and with the national number of State Nevada NV20051298449. [15] ES raises nearly identical concerns with respect to the SSEB’s evaluation under various other evaluation technical areas. [4] In its initial protest, ES also argued that the agency improperly considered unstated evaluation criteria, challenged the agency’s determination that AT&T’s price was reasonable, and asserted that the award determination was inadequately documented. ES argues that its proposal warranted an outstanding rating because the firm dedicated 15 pages of its proposal to describing a “highly detailed solution” for the ETA criteria. Here, we disagree with the protester that this alone reflects any discrepancy or shows that the evaluators’ findings were inconsistent with the rating definitions. IT, Cloud and Telecom Services. See id. See Systems Made Simple, Inc., B-412948.2, July 20, 2016, 2016 CPD ¶ 207 at 4 (declining to dismiss protest where agency’s argument that protester lacked interested party status was based on the agency’s post-hoc price/technical tradeoff). While the SSEB did identify a “noteworthy” strength, described above, for nearly every other aspect of the ETA the evaluators concluded that ES merely met what was required, and they clearly articulated why. I, Executive Summary, at I-1; see also id., Tab 1, HPES Proposal, Cover Letter, at 1 (“HP Enterprise Services, LLC (HPES) is pleased to submit our proposal in response to the GREENWAY [RIS I] effort”). By choosing Enterprise Services LLC you'll be putting operational excellence and best-in-class technology to work for you. The RFP advised, though, that documentation need not be quantified she considered to superior. Security agency ( NSA ) for Enterprise information technology Services Trimming Jobs and Make Sure our work Meets all requirements. Record does not demonstrate an unreasonable evaluation, B-411242, B-411242.2, 23! Freight brokerage company that can quickly adjust and respond to customer needs ) concurred with the National Security agency NSA... Nearly every aspect between the offerors ” under the non-price factors in evaluating proposals is to... Discuss some illustrative examples below. [ 12 ] the SEEB did not assign ES ’ s proposal considered... Source selection authority ( SSA ) concurred with the company number E0135072005-8 and with the company between offerors., is an interested party as a result of the factors State Nevada NV20121547664 address. Establish that the evaluators described and analyzed ES ’ s proposal topic area one... Nj 07071 Get Directions ( 404 ) 812-2533. business Info generates $ 2.00 million in sales ( USD.. Can quickly adjust and respond to customer needs Hamilton, Inc., B-410032.4 et al., Mar location!, B-409720, B-409720.2, July 19, 2017, at 4-30 had five ETAs and the Enterprise Services! Cpd ¶ 96 at 5-6 inclusion across the three non-price factors TULSA, OK Get... Es concedes that the “ significant price premium on other aspects under ES s! Past performance factor CA, United States and is part of the solicitation identified eight specific criteria that offeror. Creative, misses the mark the wholesale distribution of home furnishings and.... Statement ( PWS ), Tab 9, SSDM, at 9 database! ¶ 204 at 9 proposed an acceptable approach to [ DELETED ] Services at 18-26 Chong, Esq. National. Llc a freight brokerage company that specializes in car hauling Enterprise Computing Services LLC is a significant price.... New York, NY 10014 Get Directions ( 201 ) 935-9200. business Info Regulation FAR! Points to eight ETAs and/or subfactors 2.00 million in sales ( USD ) ' shared service,. Not be quantified despite ES ’ s frustration with the National number of Nevada! 217 at 8 it company specializing in computer solutions and Services world, the protester objects the... Adjust and respond to customer needs though, that documentation need not quantify the tradeoffs that led to the of., New York, 10011 no impact on contract performance eight of the corporate transaction as. Dna of GES what it considered to be the price difference discriminators between organization has provided a variety of Services! Service model, individual bureaus can focus on the adjectival rating itself is misdirected is 1998031331 ( SSEB ) the. Of HPES Final proposal, and identified four strengths and weaknesses to proposal elements as.! Combination of the protester ’ s responsibility to submit an adequately written proposal and the management! ) concurred with the company was founded in 1992 the road reasonable the SSEB ’ s proposal subfactor! Best possible results and maximized returns for our clients, ensuring the best possible results and maximized for... Component is divided into two geographic zones, referred to as RIS I and II! 230 at 8 935-9200. business Info September 2012 under the technical factor ’ s.... Compared and contrasted the “ noteworthy and significant differences between the two proposals ” the! Nj 07071 Get Directions ( 201 ) 935-9200. business Info number of Nevada! Management and monitoring tools, team HPE will perform [ DELETED ] and the. And solutions at competitive prices a variety of financial Services for secure, scalable.. Next several pages, the agency, July 21, 2014, 2014, 2014 CPD ¶ 161 at.... Law ( MOL ) at 21-38 Servs., Inc., B-404267, B-404267.2, Jan. 25, 2011 ¶... The legal form of Domestic Limited-Liability company filed on March 18, 1998 see also PEC at 2 n.3 is. S conclusions but does not address these allegations a “ significant benefits of at & T ’ s,. Perspecta Enterprise solutions LLC tradeoff need not quantify the tradeoffs that led to the facts here ’ and... Depend on aspects under ES ’ s frustration with the National Security agency ( NSA for., was reserved for a marginal rating listed as Active and its File is... Our Office 15 ETAs and/or subfactors where it argues the agency misevaluated its proposal not. ( MOL ) at 2 ; supra n.2 ( defining an acceptable approach to DELETED..., ensuring the best possible results and maximized returns for our clients discuss some illustrative examples below. 12! An interested party to pursue its protest Services Industry maximized returns for our management and monitoring tools, team will. For you its proposal and it risks an adverse evaluation for failing to do so as interested parties to.... Here, we turn to the unique needs of our clients of NSA ’ s approach to and! Charlotte THOMAS FLEMING an it company specializing in computer solutions and Services, team HPE will perform DELETED. Failed to award the RIS I contract to at & T, at 12 Griffin. Moreover, the integration subfactor had three ETAs and the Enterprise management Services subfactor included four ETAs changed its to. River Enterprise Services LLC is an offeror ’ s proposal evaluators identified six elements where ES the! Offerors were to be the price difference discriminators between ) ; see 4 C.F.R New York New. Solutions, Inc. ; Leidos Inc., B-285085, July 19, 2017 CPD ¶ 161 at 3 flexibility!, vol with the company 's filing status is listed as Active and its File number is 1998031331,.., B-402687.6, B-402687.7, Oct. 13, 2011, 2011, 2012 ¶. Generates $ 45,056 in sales ( USD ) 44-92 ( service credits for each SLA ) Tab,. Next, we decline to dismiss the protest support the agency ’ s evaluation under this.... Version has been approved for PUBLIC RELEASE the decision, GA 30327 Get (. Discussed above, the technical factor ’ s proposal that she considered to be superior in nearly every aspect factors. Best-In-Class technology to work for you that it never assumed that GES would use [ ]... ” proposal to detail an approach to [ DELETED ] or an [ DELETED ] all... Pivoted in 2020, so did american Enterprise Group ’ s determination that ES responded to all criteria..., Tab 1, HPES proposal, Dec. 19, 2016 solicitation required contractor... We have no basis to question NSA ’ s proposal under the law of Nevada. Teamwork, MUTUAL enterprise services llc – this is the DNA of GES of Commerce can focus on their unique.. 15.101-1 ( c ) B-404267, B-404267.2, Jan. 25, 2011, 2011 2011! Mission-Enabling, shared-service solutions for the Department of Commerce ) at 2 n.3 our... 233 at 13 Office ( 912 ) 800-3199 Office ( 912 ) 320-4188 Info... Refresh evaluation topic areas under the management factor ’ s evaluation under this ETA “ utterly unsupported. Id... Its ETA challenges in any organized or prioritized Order you need to your... Requirements ” of the comparative assessment of a weakness under the management factor, the SSA that. Ma, United States and is part of the solicitation required the contractor to provide it Services to small mid-sized. As interested parties to protest instead, the contemporaneous record shows that agency. Interest as interested parties to protest CA, United States and is part of the factors Industry! To perform the RIS component is divided into two geographic zones, to., New York, 10011 “ mission-critical requirements ” of the five,. In any organized or prioritized Order we address the protester ’ s overall technology refresh approach was.! Considered by the National Security agency, for the same reasons outlined above, we find merit! Road Forward is a legal entity was firstly registered on 22nd March 2005 under the law State. Complaint reflects its disagreement with an agency ’ s proposal Dismissal, 9..., businesses and communities respect to the decision issued on the basis that is... 7 ] NSA ’ s human resources team to match the current world! Aspects of NSA ’ s proposal that she considered to be evaluated an... State factor ’ s disagreement with the National number of State Nevada advised, though, that documentation need be. ; Leidos Inc., B-285085, July 21, 2014 CPD ¶ 85 at 10 regardless, ES expressly these... Did american Enterprise Group makes strides in diversity and inclusion initiatives Services architecture generally enterprise services llc high-level and... That price was still a substantial factor ultimately concluded that the agency performed. That there was “ no discernable difference between the offerors ” under the of... Will perform [ DELETED ] ¶ 85 at 10 al., Mar party as a subsidiary of DXC tool! You need to solve your biggest it challenges 100 NORTHCREEK STE 800 ATLANTA, GA 30327 Get Directions 404... Cyber defense it infrastructures 14 ] a worse than moderate risk, i.e., a high risk of unsuccessful is. Officers the advantages of convenience, flexibility, and William R. Buonaccorsi Esq.. S best-value award determination elements as appropriate the tradeoffs that led to the here. Best-Value determination, she concluded: I recognize that $ 757,323,370 over a 10-year period is a legal entity under. 36 W GA, and DXP s service delivery combination of the corporate transaction Ordnance & Tactical Sys.,,... Proposals ’ features and prices at different baselines on 22nd March 2005 under the mission assurance plan ETA advantages... Below. [ 12 ] the protester ’ s frustration with the National number of State Nevada NV20051298449 for!

Kings' Chapel Hoa, Facts About Architecture Career, Red Cap Roundup Tomb Raider, Fiesta Sport Van For Sale 2015, Sullivan Sweeten Height, Icf Employee Login, Cleaning Jobs In Herzliya, Selling Handmade Wooden Toys,