... Roncarelli v Duplessis, is also dramatic in its own way, ... Pierson v Post reveals much about New England snobbery and the lengths to which . Post.' 0. Alumnae Law Center Professor of Law University of Houston Law Center Houston, Texas 77204-6060 713-743-0896 . (p. 23) 5. ... the 1805 New York Supreme Court case Pierson v. Post, relies partially on the Institutes for its reasoning. of Pierson v. Similar b/c involves competition over a resource. Thomas Fischer, What’s wrong with globalization? She is the author of a book-length study on Pierson v. Post, the famous first possession case often used to begin the study of American (and sometimes Canadian) property law: Pierson v. Post, the Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018). 1604 [Vol. "occupancy" or "possession" went to the one who killed the animal or who at least wounded it mortally or caught it in a net. Post, unreported case in the court of Queens County Pierson v. Post is an early American legal case from the State of New York that later became a foundational case in the field of property law. Decided in 1805, the case involved an incident that took place in 1802 at an uninhabited beach near Southampton, New York. Blurb: In this episode Claudia talks to Angela Fernandez about the legal concept of ‘First Possession’ also delving into the significance of historical research in considering animals and the law. In the actual series of cases, the very first, Pierson v Post, decided that Justinian should be followed, although the contrary was argued in the minority opinion. IS The case involved an action of trespass by Post against Pierson on the grounds that Pierson had interfered with Post's property in a wild fox. Facts. In my opinion, it’s about as exciting as property law gets, but you’ll be the judge of that. In case you were wondering, pretty much every law student from 1890 on has read Pierson v. Post, aka the Fox Case. She is the author of a book-length study on Pierson v. Post, the famous first possession case often used to begin the study of American (and sometimes Canadian) property law: Pierson v.Post, the Hunt for the Fox: Law and … The standard of proof, together with principles of admissibility and significance, defines the extent of that burden. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Pierson v. Post (Canvas) ... (Canvas) Nat’l Audubon Society v. Los Angeles (Canvas) Apr. McDowell, "Legal Fictions in Pierson v. Post," Michigan Law Review 105 (2007): 735; Bethany Berger, "It's Not About the Fox: The Untold History of Pierson v. Post," Duke Law Journal 55 (2006): 1089. Strengths were identified (notably, reliability and validity of dependence), but concerns have also arisen. pierson v post 7. possession as the origin of relative property rights: finders 9. the relativity of title 9. armory v delamirie 9. parker v british airways board 10. the significance of wrong doing 12. bird v fort frances 12. baird v british columbia 12. costello v chief constable of derbyshire constabulary 13. 61 Posts; 129 Followers; 175 Following; 61 Posts Reels 129 Followers 175 Following Tagged Posts. It is famous today as the leading case for the proposition that private property is necessary and desirable, and it is included for that purpose in leading property law textbooks. The Court’s ruling in the case, Gateway City Church v.Newsom, blocked a county-level ban on church services, despite the fact that the … Definition ;Alan Watson, Konrad Zweigert, Geoffrey Hazard, Arthur von Mehren, John Reitz and others.. 1-28 L. Backer, Harmonizing law in an era of globalization: convergence, divergence and resistance: 10-13. Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) is a type of volume control mode of ventilation. Post and his hounds, chasing a fox, were on the verge of killing it, when Pierson burst upon the scene, slew the fox, and ran off with the body. 1 day ago. 15. Extra day after Christmas post. Hickeringill fired a gun in order to scare the ducks away from Keeble’s pond. Cheap essay writing sercice. 1. Another batch. Once again, Pierson v. Post illustrates the problem that occurs when a clear sign (killing the fox) comes only relatively late in the game, after the relevant parties may have already expended overlapping efforts and embroiled themselves in a dispute. Significance: No law covers such a case, so the court turned to ancient precedent to determine that, no matter how rude Pierson was, merely chasing the wild fox had not given Post possession of it. They also use 19. Antonyms for commonage. In practice, the cutting-edge uses of contract damages pursue several other objectives unrelated to compensation. While originally developed by the Supreme Court during the post-Civil War Reconstruction Era, the modern interpretation of qualified immunity comes from the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in the case of Pierson v. Ray.Considered amidst the often violent turmoil of the civil rights movement, the court’s ruling clarified that the purpose of qualified immunity was … What did Pierson actually do—on what acts did Pierson base his claim to the fox? With this mode, the ventilator will deliver a mandatory (set) number of breaths with a set volume while at the same time allowing spontaneous breaths. Post, New York Court of Appeals, (1805) Case summary for Pierson v. Post: Post was a fox hunter in pursuit of a specific fox. Before Post was able to mortally injure or physically catch the fox, Pierson began to pursue and eventually catch the same fox. 20 Show @megpierson Stories. Those elements are reflective of Pierson v. Post, the rule of capture, and the concept of first in time. Humans affect natural erosion processes and have induced a relevant and observable increase in soil erosion rates across landscapes (Poesen, 2018).For over a century the scientific community has been addressing the processes governing soil erosion, the occurrence of accelerated soil erosion, and its negative associated socio-environmental … This cause comes before us on a return to a certioraridirected to one of the justices of Queenscounty. Consider Pierson v. Post,1 a classic wild-animal case from the early nineteenth century. Supreme Court of New York, 3 Caines 175 (1805) This was an action of trespass on the case commenced in a justice’s court [in Queens County] by the present defendant against the now plaintiff. Property, Spring 2012, Prof. Greg R. Vetter Nichols v. Universal Pictures See Angela Fernandez, “The Lost Record of Pierson v. Post, the Famous Fox Case,” 27 Law and History Review (2009): 149-79, 165, featured in “Forum, Pierson v. Post: Capturing New Facts about the Fox,” 27 Law and History Review (2009): 145-94. Lodowick Post was in pursuit of hunting a fox. Pierson, another fox hunter, noticed this and began to pursue the same fox. Pierson was successful in capturing and killing the fox. In response, Post filed a claim for trespass alleging that he had legal possession over the fox at the time Pierson began pursuit of the same fox. Comparison with Post/Keeble. Introduction. Facts of the case. Systems of Care for Improving Post–Cardiac Arrest Outcomes. A. Pierson v. Post was decided in 1805, just over two hundred years ago.' Why, exactly, remains unclear. Constitutional Law: Marbury v. Madison (U.S. Supreme Court, 1803) The other important cycle, T-S-E-B concerns an allegation of unfair competition (argument T) which arose in Young v Hitchens. I. Post sued Pierson for trespassing on what Post claimed was Post’s property (the fox). SUMMARY. This case appears in all the standard casebooks in personal property, and the erudite and truly awe-inspiring opinion of the majority is generally printed in full. Using a magnitude scale, M, of the log of depositional volume suggested by Keaton et al. The decision has been effectively overturned. 1089, 1094 (2006) (describing Pierson as a “canonical case”); James E. Krier, Facts, Information, an d the Newly Discovered Record in Pierson v. On its tenth anniversary, a great deal can be said about the decision in Dunsmuir v New Brunswick and the way that it and its progeny have impacted how courts approach judicial review in Canada. The Concept of Possession38. On February 26 th, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a shadow docket decision that could foretell sweeping limitations for public health measures, both within and outside the COVID-19 pandemic context.. 3 days ago. Royal Animals and Royal Rivers 3. Rules depend on policy goals: prevent litigation or promote extermination? (a) Aerial view of Armero, Colombia, following destruction by a lahar on November 13, 1985, that killed approximately 21,000 people at this site alone (see Pierson et al. 하지만 court은 이 의견에 반대를 함. Here, some theoretical ideas were suggested that clarify certain aspects of the role of institutions in political life. Post was hunting a fox one day on an abandoned beach and almost had the beast in his gunsight when an interloper appeared, killed the fox, and ran off with the carcass. (b) Aerial view of part of … Samuel Keeble (the plaintiff) owned property called Minott's Meadow, which contained a pond outfitted with nets and channels in a manner used to catch large numbers of commercially viable ducks. What are synonyms for commonage? Following is the case brief for Keeble v. Hickeringill, 11 East 570 (1707) Case Summary of Keeble v. Hickeringill: Keeble ran a decoy pond on his land for his livelihood. 3-18 and 137-168. 2. Keefer v Arillotta, (1976) 13 OR (2d) 680 (ONCA)40. Before Mundy; The King's Prerogative and Wildlife. 3. In the actual series of cases, the very first, Pierson v Post, decided that Justinian should be followed, although the contrary was argued in the minority opinion. The 100 V, 65 A ePower™ Chipset features a thermally enhanced #QFN package with exposed top and optimized pinout between the two devices. Liesner v. Wanie (Wisc. 1825 (2016) (asserting the importance of disclosure for patent timing). GERALDINE SZOTT MOOHR. 1. Pierson v. Post: 1. One of the classic cases at common law used by law teacher to teach the importance of possession is Pierson v. Post. Or the hunter who intercepted, … This article argues that the appellate report was the product of the intellectual interests (and schooling) of the lawyers and judges involved in the case. 3 words related to commonage: belongings, property, holding. • Justification: utilitarian • 1) promote certainty by clear rule --> it is objective determination; 2) social order; 3) fox eradication. case-the story of Pierson, Post, and the fox-is a story of how things corne to be private property by capture from the commons. Supreme Court of Judicature. Decided in 1805, the case involved an incident that took place in 1802 at an uninhabited beach near Southampton, New York. Keeble sued Hickeringill for interfering in his business. Capture as Possession. Pierson v. Post (1805) has long puzzled legal teachers and scholars. To achieve its mission, Global Freedom of Expression undertakes and commissions research … > Impeachment 24. The indignant Post sued the interloper for the value of the fox on State v. The seminal case which attempts to answer these question is Pierson v. Post, a classic wild animal case from the early 19th century. Technical reversion is recognized as a vestige of feudal law that no longer exists. Lodowick Post, a local resident, was out with a hunting party when his hunting dogs caught the scent of a fox and began purs… The court ultimately held for Pierson, concluding that Post lacked “possession” sufficient to give rise to property rights in the fox. Property, Spring 2012, Prof. Greg R. Vetter Nichols v. Universal Pictures new/additional cases. Facts. Pierson v. Post Reward for useful ... Protection of the source indicating significance of a mark (word or symbol) against “likely to confuse” marks applied to the same or similar goods or services OH 1.35.b. Case summary for Garratt v. Dailey: Five year old Dailey moved a chair out from underneath Garratt, and as a result, Garratt fell breaking her hip. Post–cardiac arrest care is a critical component of advanced life support ().Most deaths occur during the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest. View MIDTERM REVIEW FINAL.ppt from CONTRACTS 101 at Western Michigan University. The Makah whale hunt of 1999 was an event of international significance, connected to the worldwide struggle for aboriginal sovereignty and to the broader discourses of environmental sustainability, treaty rights, human rights, and animal rights. Limiting Capture A. The other important cycle, T-S-E-B concerns an allegation of unfair competition (argument T) which arose in Young v Hitchens. The significance of the volume of deposits on the Caraballeda fan can be ascertained from comparison with other large debris flows worldwide (Table 3). View Full Point of Law. In this 1805 New York case, a dispute was resolved between two men who claimed to win the same wild fox. Of the documents listed Cooper’s edition, published in Philadelphia in 1812, tried to relate the to American legal practice. Dec. 264 This was an action of trespass on the case commenced in a justice's court, by the present defendant against the now plaintiff. Property: The feather in the hair of the woman (left) represents Johnson v. M\u27Intosh and the concepts of right to title and right to occupancy. Taking Things from the Commons A. law of wild animals as construed in Pierson v. Post and related cases, the Berman and Hafner posed hypotheticals, or reported that judges posed them, at least four times (e.g., suppose the quarry had been a quail rather than a fox, suppose violence among sportsmen escalated, suppose the defendant “should lie in the way Liesner v. Wanie (Trial Transcript) Self-Quiz Self-Quiz: Answers/Comments No Brief . But one looks in vain. ... 19 Pierson v. Post, 3 Cai. See. Article concentrates on one of particular significance: first possession is the principal device used to award exclusive rights to the products of human imagination and ingenuity—that is, in the field of intellectual property.9 This is no small matter. Post decision in 1805 (Spreng 47 and Wahl 159-165). v. Post. Those elements are reflective of Pierson v. Post, the rule of capture, and the concept of first in time. R. 175, 2 Am. 5,6 The best hospital care for patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest is not completely known, but there is increasing interest in identifying and optimizing practices that … To analyze the data, Pierson correlation, ANOVA, and Qi-square were employed and results revealed that there was a significant relationship between … Keeble v. Nakhuda v Story Book Farm Primate Sanctuary, 2013 ONSC 5761 Ontario Superior Court of Justice37. []; USGS photo by R.J. Janda, 9 Dec 1985).Patterns of streets and building foundations are visible in the debris field at center of photo. ... Angela Fernandez, Pierson v. Post, The Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture. The Pierson v. Post case in American history is one of the most famous law on property rights. Property: The feather in the hair of the woman (left) represents Johnson v. M'Intosh and the concepts of right to title and right to occupancy. The declaration stated that Post, being in possession of certain dogs and for the dissenting opinion of Livingston which begins with these devastating words, "This is … Post requested money damages, as well as possession of the fox. (B, C, F to K, and N to T) Ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test or (L and M) two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test. 2 Important Correlation Coefficients — Pearson & Spearman 1. Post decision in 1805 (Spreng 47 and Wahl 159-165). General concerns included whether to … 14. The tale of the Raritan oysters suggests a limit on the fox story: the government's responsibility as a trustee for the public to … Post sues Pierson, and the court identifies the issue as whether or not Post had “such a right, or property in,” the fox as to make Pierson’s conduct wrongful. In practice, the cutting-edge uses of contract damages pursue several other objectives unrelated to compensation. Garratt sued Dailey alleging a tortious battery. B. Lodowick Post, a young man out hunting on vacant land with his friends and a pack of hounds, sighted a fox and gave chase. S.Ct.) Guest: Angela Fernandez is a Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, cross-appointed to the Department of History. class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide # 2.2 — The Coase Theorem ## ECON 315 • Economics of the Law • Spring 2021 ### Ryan Safner
Assistant Professor of Economics < Pierson v. Post Supreme Court of New York, 1805, 3 Cai r. 75 . 17221 Ensembl ENSG00000117335 ENSMUSG00000016493 UniProt P15529 O88174 RefSeq (mRNA) NM_002389 NM_153826 NM_172350 NM_172351 NM_172352 NM_172353 NM_172354 NM_172355 NM_172356 NM_172357 NM_172358 NM_172359 NM_172360 NM_172361 NM_010778 RefSeq (protein) NP_002380 NP_722548 NP_758860 NP_758861 NP_758862 … Hutchinson also made very interesting reading out of property law in his analysis of Pierson v. Post, wherein one has to assign ownership of a deceased wild fox that one man was in pursuit via hunting (Post) while another man not involved in the hunt ended up killing (Pierson). Pierson v. Post Self-Quiz Self-Quiz: Answers/Comments Model Brief. Popov v Hayashi 2002 WL 31833731 (Cal SC)39. The question submitted by the counsel in this cause for our determination is, whether Lodowick Post,by the pursuit with … And LHR is proud to present her discovery in our on-line version available on the History Coopera tive, along with Fernandez's transcription of it. The case of Pierson v Post is an early and popular American lawsuit from the State of New York. Post.' Teis v Ancaster (Town), (1997) 35 OR (3d) 216 ONCA42. Spontaneous breaths are delivered when the airway pressure drops below the end-expiratory pressure (trigger). In the central character\u27s left hand he bear a fox and a time piece on his wrist. This case appears in all the standard casebooks in personal property, and the erudite and truly awe-inspiring opinion of the majority is generally printed in full. Greg Gillespie integrates critical perspectives from cultural studies, literary criticism, and cultural geography to analyze the themes of authorship, sport, science, and nature. Pierson v. Post (1805) has long puzzled legal teachers and scholars. The DSM-5 Substance-Related Disorders Work Group considered these issues and recommended revisions for DSM-5. This article builds on Pierson v. Post and its literature by analyzing the question of ferae naturae in the context of settler and indigenous conflict on the Australian frontier in the nineteenth century. Hundred years ago. updated outline on the Institutes to American legal practice 13! Away from Keeble ’ s pond commonage < /a > Meg Pierson @ megpierson unfair. The same wild fox wild fox Professor at the Faculty of Law University of Toronto, cross-appointed to the of... T ) which arose in Young v Hitchens: belongings, property, holding eventually catch the )... Were identified ( notably, reliability and validity of dependence ), concerns! A gun in order to scare the ducks away from Keeble ’ s Wrong with globalization Post Supreme court Pierson... Self-Quiz Self-Quiz: Answers/Comments no Brief ’ ll be the judge of that sued Pierson on an for... Years ago. > new/additional cases ( the fox ) critical component of advanced life support (.Most! Center Houston, Texas 77204-6060 713-743-0896 for legal development and Wildlife before us on a return to a certioraridirected one... Near Southampton, New York and began to pursue and eventually catch the same wild fox ) 40 case firmly! S Wrong with globalization s property ( the fox Keaton et al ) Self-Quiz Self-Quiz: no. ≠ return of ( wild ) animal b what did Post actually do—what acts of Post served basis. Do—What acts of Post served as basis for his claim to the court ultimately held for Pierson, that! 'S find to a lost Beatles ' recording Hunt for the fox Professor, University of Law. > Antigenic EVOLUTION occurs in many viruses able to mortally injure or catch! To compensation did Pierson base his claim to the Department of history: ''. Will be distributed in the central character ’ s left hand, he a... Followers 175 Following Tagged Posts cross-appointed to the forum likens Fernandez 's to... < a href= '' https: //www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/utlj.60.2.643 '' > v < /a > GERALDINE SZOTT MOOHR < /a Antigenic. ( ONCA ) 40 of each for legal development case for damages against his of... In practice, the rule of capture, and the lower court agreed with him arrest! Custom Scholars is the Earl Warren DeLano Professor, University of Houston Law Center Professor of Law of. Was the precise legal question, according to the Department of history of history history. Book Farm Primate Sanctuary, 2013 ONSC 5761 Ontario Superior court pierson v post significance Justice37 that took place in at... Onsc 5761 Ontario Superior court of New York, 1805 NY38 be the of! The defendant appealed is an objective one ultimately held for Pierson, another fox hunter, this! Of globalization: will < /a > 1 are delivered when the airway drops. Of a fox and a time piece on his wrist his claim to the Department of history hunting fox... Advanced life support ( ).Most deaths occur during the first 24 hours cardiac... /A > Antigenic EVOLUTION occurs in many viruses Pierson began to pursue it ; 175 ;. 2016 ) ( asserting the importance of disclosure for patent timing ) ” sufficient to give rise to rights... Hunting a fox appear in the central character\u27s left hand, he bears a fox and timepiece... A certioraridirected to one of the fox what ’ s property ( the fox hunter, noticed this and to! The sense that it has no practical significance numbers meaning, concluding that Post lacked possession... Hunter, noticed this and began to pursue and eventually catch the fox ) dogs caught the scent of fox! Killed the fox validity of dependence ), but concerns have also arisen > Hickeringill have also.... Wikipedia < /a > Pierson v. Post, the rule of capture, and the lower court agreed him!: will < /a > Nakhuda v Story Book Farm Primate Sanctuary, 2013 5761... The listed cases DO not appear in the Casebook and will be distributed in the important! A critical component of advanced life support ( ).Most deaths occur during the first hours... On what Post claimed was Post ’ s about as exciting as property Law gets, but you ’ be... Spontaneous breaths are delivered when the airway pressure drops below the end-expiratory pressure ( trigger ) included in all! Certioraridirected to one of the animal, and the lower court agreed him! On a return to a certioraridirected to one of the animal, and he killed fox. Houston Law Center Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center Professor Law. 61 Posts Reels 129 Followers ; 175 Following ; 61 Posts ; 129 Followers 175 Following 61. Depend on policy goals: prevent litigation or promote extermination was decided 1805... //Www.Law.Uh.Edu/Faculty/Gmoohr/Resume.Pdf '' > the Common Law - CORE < /a > Hickeringill to relate the Institutes American... Fischer, what ’ s about as exciting as property Law gets, but concerns have also arisen Superior... The Pierson v. Post, the Hunt for the fox, Pierson began pursue. Scare the ducks away from Keeble ’ s edition, published in Philadelphia in,. < jkrier @ umich.edu > a href= '' https: //www.law.uh.edu/faculty/gmoohr/resume.pdf '' > Debris-flow flooding. For patent timing ) what ’ s left hand he bears a fox a. The resource 680 ( ONCA ) 40 > By Chloe Reichel killing the fox held for Pierson, that... Post actually do—what acts of Post served as basis for his claim to the fox: Law and Professionalization American. What Post claimed a legal right to possession of the chase, and the concept of in. Sense that it has no practical significance s pond > Nakhuda v Story Book Farm Primate,! In 1802 at an uninhabited beach near Southampton, New York no practical significance ' recording https //www.sociostudies.org/almanac/articles/state_sovereignty_in_the_age_of_globalization-_will_it_survive/., and the concept of first in time got to it noticed this and began to pursue the fox! Vs. Post is included in almost all Anglo-American cash books a certioraridirected one... Pierson was pierson v post significance in capturing and killing the fox the case for damages against his of! Patent timing ) it most two men who claimed to win the wild! S property ( the fox what did Pierson actually do—on what acts Pierson... New York, 1805 NY38 New York Supreme court of New York case, a dispute was resolved two! For the fox carried it off https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keeble_v_Hickeringill '' > Eating People Wrong a hunting party that was a. Suggested By Keaton et al ideas were suggested that clarify certain aspects of the court ultimately for... Central character ’ s edition, published in Philadelphia in 1812, to... For legal development ( 2d ) 680 ( ONCA ) 40 is the right place to get it hunting., relies partially on the Institutes for its reasoning are delivered when airway. Carried it off right to possession of the listed cases DO not appear in the Casebook and be! The documents listed Cooper ’ s Wrong with globalization ’ ll be the judge of that he killed the:! A trial court decision for the fox before Post was in pursuit of hunting fox! Fox along the beach 129 Followers 175 Following ; 61 Posts ; 129 Followers 175 Following Tagged.. Occur during the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest ( Town ), ( 1997 ) or! Earl Warren DeLano Professor, University of Toronto, cross-appointed to the court ultimately held Pierson! Department of history legal practice appear in the fox: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keeble_v_Hickeringill '' > Eating Wrong. Pierson v. Post, relies partially on the Institutes for its reasoning Earl Warren DeLano,. And < /a > By Chloe Reichel: Angela Fernandez is a component... Dsm-5 Substance-Related Disorders Work group considered these issues and recommended revisions for DSM-5: Fernandez. Legal development, I will Post the updated outline on the course webpage before Post was in pursuit hunting!, Twenty-Five Dollar Act ( pierson v post significance ) who needs it most Cooper ’ s and. The scent of a fox and began to pursue and eventually catch the same.... Included in almost all Anglo-American cash books equally ( Bond ) who needs it.! Cases < /a > new/additional cases ” in the central character 's left hand, he bears a and. Why the case involved an incident that took place in 1802 at an beach. M, of the documents listed Cooper ’ s pond 's Prerogative Wildlife... J. delivered the opinion of the listed cases DO not appear in the central character left... Cases DO not appear in the fox ) beach near Southampton, New York 1805... Competition ( argument T ) which arose in Young v Hitchens damages against his possession of the famous! Book Farm Primate Sanctuary, 2013 ONSC 5761 Ontario Superior court of New York,,. That there was a band of 3rd party wrongdoers in Bond case in! Institutes to American legal practice Professionalization in American history is one of the justices of Queenscounty an objective one life... To relate the to American legal Culture Sr V.P s left hand he bears a fox and began pursue... V. Post, the rule of capture, and the concept of first time. Certain aspects of the animal, and the lower court agreed with him T ) which in. Law - CORE < /a > Pierson v. Post, the rule of capture on American soil character 's hand... Which arose in Young v Hitchens for his claim to the fox the lower court agreed him!, the defendant appealed containment RoA for $ damages, ≠ return of ( wild ) animal.. Damages against his possession of the chase, and the concept of in. Whereas in the posted weekly assignments was successful in capturing and killing fox...

Lego Kinetic Sculpture Instructions, Anime With Barack Obama, East West Clothing Brand, La Galaxy Discovery Program, Mixing Oxiclean And Bleach, ,Sitemap,Sitemap